About Talia Whyte

Posts by Talia Whyte:

Why More Books by Authors of Color Are Needed

We Need Diverse BooksRecently, the Duluth, MN public school system decided to drop two American classicsTo Kill a Mocking Bird and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn – from its required reading list because of their liberal uses of the n-word.

I agree with the books getting dropped, but not for the same reasons.  Quite honestly, there are many classic books by black authors that also drop the n-word a lot, like Invisible Man, Native Son, and Their Eyes Were Watching God and many others.  The two books in question written by Harper Lee and Mark Twain shouldn’t be removed because of the racial slur, but because they are outdated with problematic themes written from a white perspective.

When To Kill a Mocking Bird was published in 1960, it was groundbreaking because it was really the first book to address racism from a white liberal perspective. It became a symbol for white people who didn’t want to be lumped in with the KKK, Nazis and other white racists of the day. TKMB was like an earlier version of the #MeToo movement for white liberals.  However, the book did jumpstart the white savior complex genre, which is when a book or film that is supposedly about racism really centers around a good-hearted white protagonist and the issues of people of color are an afterthought.  The book should really be about Tom Robinson, a black man falsely accused of raping a white woman, but it is entirely focused on the feelings of Atticus Finch, the good white liberal who has to save helpless black people from themselves.  We never know if Finch uses his white privilege to challenge the racist status quo beyond defending Robinson, but apparently, he turned out to be a racist in Go Set A Watchman.  You can read more about white savior complex here.

As for Huckleberry Finn, while Twain was a brilliant social commentator, the portrayal of Jim and Tom are problematic and just downright offensive near the end of the book.  If anything, the book reinforces some of the racist stereotypes of black people during the late 19th century.

Because these two books are still considered great American classics, they are still viewed as the best books for discussing race in the classroom.  But in reality, they are not.  It is hard to have meaningful discussions about race with these books in a classroom in 2018.  I remember reading both of these books when I was high school 25 years ago, and my well-intentioned, white liberal teacher found it difficult to really have a thoughtful conversation about it because she didn’t want to talk about slavery or black men accused of raping white women.

The solution to this is not just hiring more teachers and administrators of color (which is a whole other conversation), but to also include more books written by authors of color in the curriculum.  As the country becomes more multicultural, in order to truly address the racial realities in America, students need to read more books from the perspective of people of color.  There are statistics to back up this problem.  According to the Cooperative Children’s Book Center, out of 3,500 children’s books in schools surveyed in 2014, only 180 were about black people.  The numbers are even worse for books about Hispanics, Asians and Native Americans.  In 2016, out of 3,400 required reading books from around the country, only 441 of them were written by authors of color (This number is black, Hispanic, Asian and Native American writers combined).  And this is in a country that will be minority-majority in 2050!

A couple of years ago, I wrote about my friend, Reginald, who is a gay, black man who works in a publishing firm that puts out young adult books.  He had an even more radical take on diverse reading than even I was thinking: “Schools should put a moratorium by dead, straight, white guys, at least at the high school level.  High school is a great time to expose students to diverse ideas and views since teenagers are beginning to develop their own identities and perspectives.”

As for his own reading habits:  “I don’t read books by white guys anymore. Those books don’t reflect my life, my color, my culture, my masculinity or my sexuality.”

It would be great if school districts included Ta-Nehisi Coates’s Between the World and Me and Angie Thomas’s The Hate U Give as required reading, but that is me thinking out loud. Again, I am not for removing or banning all books from a white perspective, but it is time to include more books from diverse perspectives.

Re-Read Book Club: Invisible Man

I am invisible, understand, simply because people refuse to see me. – Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison

I like re-reading certain books, usually masterpieces, because I get a different perspective as I age and gain more life experience.  I have read Invisible Man at least five times, and I learn something new about it and myself in every re-read.

When I re-read it again last month, I began to think about my own invisibility.  In the book the narrator is recruited by the Brotherhood, an activist group mostly run by white people that recruits him to give speeches and become the next Booker T. Washington.  It was clear that the narrator was being used by this organization and he was expected to not have his own opinions because they knew what was best.  This reminds me of my own time working for a particular organization I worked for and felt invisible.

Similar to the Brotherhood, the organization I worked for was run by white people but most of the underlings were people of color like myself.  Even though the organization mostly worked on issues that directly impacted people of color, the white leadership thought they knew better than their black, brown and Asian co-workers because of “their history in progressive politics.”  Most of the white folks in this organization were 1960s hippies who were involved in the civil right movement.

Needless to say, I didn’t work there for very long…

They were blind, bat blind, moving only by the echoed sounds of their own voices. And because they were blind they would destroy themselves and I’d help them. I laughed. Here I had thought they accepted me because they felt that color made no difference when in reality it made no difference because they didn’t see either color or men . . . For all they were concerned, we were so many names scribbled on fake ballots, to be used at their convenience and when not needed to be filed away. It was a joke, an absurd joke. 

“Being invisible and without substance, a disembodied voice, as it were, what else could I do? What else but try to tell you what was really happening when your eyes were looking through? And it is this which frightens me: “Who knows but that, on the lower frequencies, I speak for you?”

Ralph Ellison was a genius and you can listen to more of his thought process on invisibility:

Why Are We Americans in 2018?

Just in case you need further evidence of the bad direction this country is going, here is an old Def Poetry Jam video of the late Amiri Baraka talking about the state of this country.  He is still right in 2018.

No More Celebrity Presidents

I will just get straight to the point: Oprah Winfrey cannot run for president.

I don’t dislike like her, and it’s nothing personal.  To the contrary, I think she is a pioneer and a role model for many people who work in media.  For a woman who survived extreme poverty and sexual abuse in racially segregated Mississippi to emerge as a billionaire TV mogul, this is something to be admired.  She is also a kind, smart and an all-around great person.

However, this doesn’t make her qualified to be president.  It seems like a lot of people want her to run for the highest office simply because she is a TV celebrity.  We already have a TV celebrity president who is not working out well because he has no experience with governance and policy.  Having appropriate experience still counts for something today.  While some people would argue that Trump’s business acumen is enough for running the country, I have yet to see his boardroom skills translate well into how he runs the government.  To his credit, at least actor-turned-politician Ronald Reagan was governor of California for 12 years before running for president.

Also, Trump isn’t well-versed on the issues.  When I saw him during the immigration discussions last week, he looked like he was in over his head.  Where does Winfrey stand on any of the issues?  What is her position on immigration, healthcare or criminal justice reform?  I think she intentionally doesn’t take public positions on issues because she doesn’t want to offend the millions of people who love her brand.  If she is seriously considering a run for office, she can’t be neutral on anything.  And if she were to take a position, then the next question is how knowledgeable she is on the issue and how would she enforce it.  It might disappoint her supporters that she isn’t as well-versed on the issues either. Sure, she could hire the best political consultants, but if the captain doesn’t know how to steer the ship, we are all lost.

Also, this is just continuing a disturbing trend in how Americans select presidents.  As you might remember, many people voted for George W. Bush just because he is the type of guy they would like to have a beer with.  Voters are now, unfortunately, equating kindness and likability with competency.  Maybe if we had elected Al Gore, or Al Bore as some call him, perhaps we wouldn’t be still going through the global disaster better known as the so-called “War on Terror.” Maybe Hurricane Katrina would have been handled differently.  I would be the first to admit that Hillary Clinton has a boring, cold personality; however, I voted for her because she is smart, competent and I wouldn’t have to worry about her starting World War III unnecessarily like the current moron-in-chief.  Trump was mainly elected because of this country’s obsession with celebrity culture worship (mixed in with racism and tribalism), and now Oprah might be the next celebrity president.  And before you know it, we will have President Kim Kardashian, President The Rock, President Beyonce, President Caitlyn Jenner, or whoever celebrity has the most likes on social media.

Giving a good speech at the Golden Globes doesn’t equal to being a good president.  Oprah will not save us, but experience will.